| A Failure of Leadership |
|
Leaders set the context for recognizing, developing, and leveraging everyday greatness that exists within any organization. Leaders must ensure that the environment is one that encourages everyone to work to the best of their abilities. That process starts with building relationships, a primary function of those serving in a leadership role. Life is about relationships, and success in the workplace is intricately tied to the personal connections that are built and maintained. Self-help author Brian Tracy said, “The glue that holds all relationships together—including the relationship between the leader and the led—is trust, and trust is based on integrity.” Establishing trust is the most basic requirement of any relationship. Without it, all else falters.
I was reminded of this caveat as I observed a new leader forge ahead in a division of high achievers. His mistakes were many, and his blindness to his inability to engage others and to build trust was astounding; needless to say, the results were devastating.
The classic mistakes that many new leaders make were compounded as I observed his style over the first 90 days—he discounted everything, and I mean everything, his colleagues had developed and achieved through years of hard effort. There was a constant, demeaning stream of negative comments about how the work of the division was being conducted. If the practices and processes were not being done in a way he had done them in the past, they were wrong. There was no opportunity for others to offer insight into why the various tools and methods were developed and how they supported the organization’s objectives. He was acutely unaware of the consequences of many of his decisions. There was only a declaration that everything was going to change—to his way of doing things.
Changes began taking place in a vacuum. There was no communication, which resulted in a constant state of anxiety, nervous tension, and rumors. Those we spoke with were so unsettled they could not focus on their work, and were having clear-cut symptoms of profound stress.
Collaboration with his colleagues to engage them in making the changes never happened. Dictates were the order of the day. People who had labored long hours because of their commitment to the business began leaving at 5:00 P.M. sharp. Many made a habit of “working from home” to avoid interaction with this leader. Office potluck lunches, once an occasion for camaraderie, ceased to exist as people preferred to “lay low.”
Perhaps this leader’s most devastating behavior was the pitting of staff against staff as a tactic, in his mind at least, that would create loyalty to his leadership. Confidential information, even information on who he was thinking of firing, was shared with a selected few who became his “go-to” people. A strategic plan was developed without input and presented to the team as a final product with no opportunity for reaction or feedback.
By the fifth month of his leadership, six of his best performers had resigned and those remaining were actively searching for a way to get out. It is not surprising that this division did a quick downward spiral and has little chance of surviving.
This leader had a lot of great ideas that could have had a tremendous positive impact on the organization. This is a story of a failure of leadership. I see it all too often as I work with organizations across the country.
Until next time, find and celebrate the greatness in your life! |

